Tucker Carlson Dares Piers Morgan To Say 'Faggot' In Viral Interview

During a recent viral interview on his podcast, American commentator Tucker Carlson and British journalist Piers Morgan discussed, and among other topics, the state of free speech in the UK, the cultural decline of Britain, and the implications for the wider Anglosphere.

At one point during the interview, Carlson recounted a story about the arrest and conviction of Elizabeth Kinney, a 34-year-old English woman, who was sentenced to a 12-month community order, 72 hours of unpaid work, 10 rehabilitation days, and a £364 fine for calling a man who allegedly assaulted her a "faggot" in text messages to a mutual friend.

The incident drew intense scrutiny because the man who allegedly assaulted Kinney was never charged, while she faced legal consequences for using a 'homophobic slur.' Carlson argued that free speech in the UK is severely restricted, even stating that there were three times as many arrests for "speech crimes" in the UK as in Vladimir Putin’s Russia, despite having half the population. Morgan disputed this statistic, calling it "ridiculous" and arguing that the UK is not more authoritarian than Russia.

Carlson challenged Morgan directly, asking if he would say the word "faggot" on camera, to which Morgan immediately replied "No." Carlson then joked, "You don’t want to get arrested, do ya?" Morgan claimed that he refused to use the slur not out of fear of arrest, but because he believes in not needlessly smearing others, even when making a point.

The American commentator, in contrast, said he had used the word in the past in contexts where it was not meant to demean, noting that it is often used casually among gay men in the entertainment industry. He argued that the word has become a "magic word" that people are no longer allowed to use, despite its common usage in certain communities. The exchange went viral on social media, with Morgan later retweeting the clip and explaining his refusal to say the slur as a matter of respect for gay people.

The duo also debated the origins of sexual orientation, cultural influences, and shifting self-identification trends, with Carlson questioning whether social messaging and propaganda could influence identity, while Morgan maintained that "if you’re gay, you’re gay" and that sexual orientation is innate.

The discussion centered on the rise in LGBTQ+ identification, with Carlson suggesting that factors like pornography and cultural shifts could "move" people toward homosexuality, a claim Morgan rejected as outdated.

Carlson questioned the scientific basis for innate sexual orientation, asking, "So there’s a gay gene?" and humorously noting he had "ordered a gay gene and it hasn’t arrived yet."

Morgan insisted that people are born gay, stating, "If you’re gay, you’re gay," and argued that social acceptance affects disclosure, citing historical repression and criminalization of homosexuality in countries like those in Asia.

Carlson also raised concerns about the cultural and demographic implications of rising LGBTQ+ identification, suggesting that higher rates of homosexuality could lead to fewer children, a point Morgan disputed.

The conversation touched on international comparisons, with Carlson noting lower self-reported homosexuality rates in countries like South Korea and Japan, prompting Morgan to argue that cultural repression and fear of legal consequences prevent open disclosures.

Earlier in the interview, Carlson reflected on the fall of the British Empire, questioning how a nation that once controlled a quarter of the Earth’s surface and won both World Wars could now be reduced to a "sad, soggy welfare state." He described a Britain that has undergone a profound cultural transformation, marked by rising drug and alcohol use, declining public order, and a sense of national defeat.

Their conversation touched on the impact of mass immigration on London, with Carlson noting that the city’s appearance and social fabric have changed dramatically. He observed that while London remains a beautiful and vibrant city, its streets are less tidy, with increased litter and graffiti, reflecting a broader societal shift. The discussion implied that these changes are tied to a larger cultural transformation, where traditional British identity is being eroded by new social norms and legal restrictions on speech.

Morgan acknowledged a "massive rising issue with the suppression of free speech" but pushed back against Carlson’s comparison of the UK to Putin’s Russia, arguing that the UK remains a free society despite its challenges.

The two also discussed the UK’s decision to enter World War II, with Carlson suggesting Britain voluntarily joined a war it was not directly involved in, while Morgan defended the country’s role as a necessary stand against fascism.